{"id":10752,"date":"2021-08-31T13:30:50","date_gmt":"2021-08-31T17:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ssaquebec.wp.vortexdev.comen\/news\/our-postdoctoral-fellow-amede-gogovor-and-his-colleagues-publish-an-analysis-on-the-challenges-and-solutions-of-integrating-sex-and-gender-considerations-in-knowledge-translation\/"},"modified":"2023-07-10T14:25:20","modified_gmt":"2023-07-10T18:25:20","slug":"our-postdoctoral-fellow-amede-gogovor-and-his-colleagues-publish-an-analysis-on-the-challenges-and-solutions-of-integrating-sex-and-gender-considerations-in-knowledge-translation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ssaquebec.wp.vortexdev.com\/en\/news\/our-postdoctoral-fellow-amede-gogovor-and-his-colleagues-publish-an-analysis-on-the-challenges-and-solutions-of-integrating-sex-and-gender-considerations-in-knowledge-translation\/","title":{"rendered":"Our postdoctoral fellow Am\u00e9d\u00e9 Gogovor and his colleagues publish an analysis on the challenges and solutions of integrating sex and gender considerations in knowledge translation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Our postdoctoral fellow Am\u00e9d\u00e9 Gogovor<\/strong> and his colleagues have published an analysis on the challenges and solutions of integrating sex and gender considerations in knowledge translation. Sex and gender considerations are essential elements of designing, implementing and reporting interventions. Integrating sex and gender ensures that there is more relevant evidence to translate (disseminate) into the real world.<\/p>\n\n

Six projects under study<\/h2>\n\n

Canada has funding opportunities specifically for sex- and gender-inclusive knowledge translation projects. The article \u201cSex and gender analysis in knowledge translation interventions: challenges and solutions\u201d looks at sex and gender can be integrated in six funded knowledge translation projects. In 2018, six research teams funded by the Institute of Gender and Health (IGH)<\/a>\u00a0met in Ottawa to discuss these challenges and solutions. Eighteen participants, including researchers, health professionals, fellows and IGH members, were divided into two groups. Two authors carried out qualitative coding and thematic analysis of the material discussed. Six themes emerged:<\/p>\n

\n
    \n
  1. l’\u00e9tablissement de consensus<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. l’orientation des guides<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. la conception et l’efficacit\u00e9 des r\u00e9sultats<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. la recherche documentaire et le recrutement<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. l’acc\u00e8s et la collecte des donn\u00e9es<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  6. l’intersection avec d’autres d\u00e9terminants de la sant\u00e9<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n

    In solution mode<\/h2>\n\n

    Solutions that emerged from this exercise included:<\/p>\n

    \n